论文部分内容阅读
根据驱动模式的不同可将生产者服务业划分为成本驱动型和差异化驱动型,并在区间霍特林模型基础上分别探讨两种驱动模式下生产者服务业与制造业之间的互动关系,旨在揭示相对于成本驱动型、差异化驱动型与制造业之间更容易形成良好的互动关系。在理论分析的基础上,利用中国1999-2010年的分省面板数据,对不同驱动模式的生产者服务业与制造业的互动关系进行实证检验。实证结果表明:成本驱动型生产者服务业虽有效推动了经济增长,但与制造业的互动关系却不理想;差异化驱动型生产者服务业与制造业的互动关系虽然良好,但其对经济增长的推动作用却并没有有效发挥。因此制造业的产业升级有赖于差异化驱动型生产者服务业的进一步发展,需要在人力资本、高端制造业、制度环境等方面进一步推进和优化。
According to the different driving modes, the producer service industry can be divided into cost-driven and differentiated-driven. Based on the interval Hotelling model, the author discusses the interactive relationship between producer service and manufacturing under the two driving modes , Aims to reveal that relative to the cost-driven, differential-driven and manufacturing more easily formed between the good interaction. Based on the theoretical analysis, we use the provincial panel data from 1999 to 2010 in China to test the interactive relationship between producer services and manufacturing in different driving modes. The empirical results show that although the cost-driven producer services promote economic growth effectively, the interaction with manufacturing industry is not ideal. Although the interactive relationship between service-oriented manufacturing and differentiated-driven producer services is good, The promotion of growth has not been effective. Therefore, the upgrading of the manufacturing industry depends on the further development of the differentiated-driven producer services. It needs to be further promoted and optimized in terms of human capital, high-end manufacturing, and institutional environment.