论文部分内容阅读
本文据2008年上海家庭生活调查资料,通过对不同职业的实际收入、从业者所期望的公平收入、公众所估计的实际收入和所认可的公平收入的比较分析,呈现了公众对职业间收入差距的容忍度,揭示了职业公平收入的合法性基础。研究表明,收入不公平感是不同职业的从业者所共有的感受,它除了与客观收入差距有关外,还与公众对不同职业实际收入的认知偏差有关。公众所能容忍的最低职业收入与最高职业收入的比大约为1:10到1:13之间,大体上反映了城市职业间公平收入的最大差距。以人力资本、专业技术为基础的职业,其从业者获得更高收入的期望具有合法性;而以公共权力和经济资产为基础的职业,其从业者获得更高收入的期望,则缺乏社会共识的支持。
According to the 2008 Shanghai Family Life Survey data, a comparative analysis of the actual income of different occupations, the fair income expected by practitioners, the actual income estimated by the public and the recognized fair income shows the gap between the public and occupations Tolerance, revealing the basis for the legitimacy of professional fair income. The research shows that the sense of income inequality is a common feeling among practitioners of different occupations. Apart from being related to the objective income gap, it also has something to do with the public’s cognitive bias of the actual income of different occupations. The ratio of the minimum and the highest professional income that the public can tolerate is roughly 1:10 to 1:13, largely reflecting the widest gap in fair pay among urban jobs. Professionals based on human capital and expertise have legitimacy in their expectations of higher incomes for practitioners, while social occupations based on public power and economic assets have higher expectations of income for their practitioners support.