法官释明权与辩论主义有着不可分割的关系。一方面,释明权的产生是为了弥补辩论主义的不足;另一方面,辩论主义又为释明权限定了范围。所以应从两者辩证关系的角度入手,对释明权的行使进行分析和论证,并在立法和实践中限制其范围,规范其应用,才能更好的发挥释明权的作用。 Judge’s right to explain and debate have an indivisible relationship. On the one hand, the power of interpretation is to make up for the deficiencies of the debate; on the other hand, the debate doctrine defines the scope of interpretation. Therefore, it is necessary to start from the perspective of the dialectical relationship between the two, to analyze and demonstrate the exercise of the right to interpret, and to limit its scope and regulate its application in legislation and practice so that the function of interpretation can be better played.