论文部分内容阅读
刘向作为《战国策》的编定者,对该书总体性质的形成有着深刻的影响。以往质疑刘向部属归类的讨论,未能在此前提之下进行讨论。由此,论者往往过度聚焦于书中具体篇章所体现的子书色彩,却游离了最应着力审视的全书总体性质。事实上,通过审视该书编辑体例、编辑目的,以及刘向对其在部属归类上的斟酌取舍,不难得出《战国策》总体性质是史料汇编类文献的结论。概言之,刘向对《战国策》的部属归类是合理的。这也展现了一代文献学大家卓越的专业眼光。
As the editor of “Warring States Policy”, Liu Xiang has a profound influence on the formation of the overall nature of the book. In the past questioned Liu Xiang subordinate categorical discussion, failed to discuss under this premise. As a result, critics tend to overemphasize the color of the children’s books embodied in the specific chapters of the book, but they are free from the overall nature of the whole book which should be most scrutinized. In fact, it is not difficult to conclude that the overall nature of “Warring States Policy” is a historical compilation of literature by examining the editorial style of the book, the purpose of editing, and Liu’s choice of subordination. In short, Liu Xiang’s classification of subordinates to the Warring States Policy is reasonable. This also shows the excellent professional vision of all generations of bibliography.