合理使用等现有的事先限制知识产权请求权的方法虽然各有适用的领域,但也存在各自的缺陷,无法解决侵害行为发生后知识产权请求权的限制问题。在侵害行为发生后,由于知识产权对他人自由的妨碍、单个知识产权效率难以确定以及使公共利益受损等原因,知识产权人不能行使停止侵害请求权,而只能由侵害行为人通过支付使用费的方式进行补偿。然而,知识产权请求权的限制毕竟是例外情形,因此,立法上有必要明确规定不能行使知识产权请求权的特别情形。 The existing methods such as rational use and prior limitation of intellectual property right claim have their own respective defects though they have different applicable fields and can not solve the restriction of intellectual property claim right after the infringement. After the act of infringement, the intellectual property right can not exercise the right of cessation of infringement because of the obstruction of the freedom of others, the difficulty of determining the efficiency of a single intellectual property and the damage to the public interest, Fees way to compensate. However, the limitation of intellectual property right is, after all, an exception. Therefore, it is necessary in legislation to specify the special circumstances in which the right of intellectual property can not be exercised.