论文部分内容阅读
没有责任就没有犯罪。要使行为人承担故意犯罪的罪责,主观上必须具有认识因素与意志因素。但是,关于认识因素的内容与程度,则存在争议。刑法上的错误论是故意论的反面。错误论的核心问题是,是否就发生了的结果对行为人进行主观归责。就具体的方法错误而言,具体符合说认为行为人的主观归责受到影响,法定符合说则持否定意见。围绕具体的方法错误所展开的争论,根源于对故意的界定存在差异,同时涉及着手的认定标准和未遂犯的处罚根据等问题。相对而言,具体的符合说更为妥当。对故意的认定与对行为人的主观归责应当分别进行判断。
There is no crime without responsibility. In order to make the perpetrator bear the responsibility of intentional crime, subjective must have the cognitive factors and the will factors. However, there is controversy over the content and extent of awareness. Fallacy in criminal law is the opposite of intentional theory. The core issue of error theory is whether or not subjective imputation of the perpetrator occurs as a result of the eventuality. In terms of specific methodological errors, the subjective imputation of the perpetrator is affected by the specific agreement, and the negative opinion is reached by the statutory conformity. The controversy surrounding specific methodological errors stems from such issues as the deliberate definition of delinquency, the criteria for determining what to do and the basis of penalties for attempted offenses. Relatively speaking, the specific match is more appropriate. On the intentional identification and subjective attribution of the perpetrator should be judged separately.