论文部分内容阅读
目的了解高速动车组司机作业前后疲劳状况。方法采用现场测试及疲劳指标评估表调查高速动车组司机的主客观疲劳状况并与既有线动车组司机进行比较。结果京津城际高速动车组司机作业前后闪光融合频率测试疲劳状况不明显,而既有线动车组司机却有统计学差异;疲劳指标评估表经疲劳类型除权后高速动车组司机的疲劳类型按疲劳程度由高到低排序为整体身心疲劳、脑力疲劳、心理疲劳、眼疲劳及体力疲劳,退乘后与出乘前的疲劳程度表现相吻合:既有线动车组司机退乘后的疲劳类型按疲劳程度由高到低排序为心理疲劳、整体身心疲劳、脑力疲劳、眼疲劳及体力疲劳。结论应根据动车组司机的作业特点,重点关注动车组司机的心理疲劳状况。
Objective To understand the fatigue of high-speed EMU drivers before and after operation. Methods The field test and the fatigue index evaluation table were used to investigate the subjective and objective fatigue of drivers of high-speed EMUs and compare them with the drivers of existing EMUs. Results There was no significant difference in flash fusion frequency before and after operation between drivers of Beijing-Tianjin intercity high-speed EMU and fatigue of existing drivers of EMU. The fatigue index evaluation table was based on the type of fatigue of high-speed EMU driver after fatigue type The rankings ranked as high and low as overall physical and mental fatigue, mental fatigue, mental fatigue, eye fatigue and physical fatigue, which coincided with the performance of ExxonMallian Exhaustion: the fatigue type of drivers after exiting the EMU was fatigue The order from high to low is mental fatigue, mental and physical fatigue, mental fatigue, eye fatigue and physical fatigue. Conclusion According to the operation characteristics of EMU drivers, the focus should be on the psychological fatigue of EMU drivers.