论文部分内容阅读
对《过秦论》“仁义不施而攻守之势异也”这句话,新编高中语文教材的编者在“思考和练习”中列举了三种理解法让师生选择。第三种理解的错误是显而易见的,这里且不去管它。前两种理解是这样: ①因为秦始皇不施行仁义,所以才使攻守之势起了变化,由攻势转为守势。②秦国攻守之势已经发生了变化,可是秦始皇却不施行。新《高级中学语文第四册教学参考书》《人民教育出版社出版),认为:“第一种理解正确。”其理由是:“‘仁义不施’是‘攻
Regarding the sentence “The Theory of Qin Shi” (“Quality and Intentionality”), the editors of the new high school Chinese textbooks listed three kinds of comprehension methods for teachers and students in “thinking and practicing”. The third kind of understanding of the mistake is obvious, and it does not ignore it. The first two kinds of understanding are as follows: 1 Because Qin Shihuang did not practice righteousness, it made the offensive and defensive changes from offensive to defensive. 2 The offensive and defensive status of Qin State has changed, but Qin Shi Huang has not implemented it. The new “Chinese Teaching Books for Senior High School 4th Book of Education,” published by the People’s Education Publishing House, states: “The first kind of understanding is correct.” The reason is: “‘Benevolence’s injustice’ is a ‘attack’.