论文部分内容阅读
问题的提出2000年12月20日，一批青岛市民以青岛市规划局批准在音乐广场北侧建立住宅区，破坏了广场景观，破坏了青岛市引以为荣的海滨景观，损害了自己的优美环境享受权为由，将青岛市规划局告上了法庭。为了便于法庭确认原告身份。他们推举了3名代表，请求法院判决撤销规划局批准在广场北侧建立住宅区的行政行为。这例以不特定多数人的环境权益受损为由提起的诉讼带来了诸多思考：这批青岛市民是否享有原告资格并进而取得原告地位（法院是否受理）？优美的环境权益能否得到法庭的认同和得到法律的保护？
On December 20, 2000, a batch of Qingdao citizens approved the establishment of residential quarters on the north side of Music Square by the Planning Bureau of Qingdao City, undermining the landscape of the square and undermining the magnificent seaside landscape of Qingdao and harming their own Beautiful environment to enjoy the grounds, the Qingdao Municipal Planning Bureau to the court. In order to facilitate the court to confirm the plaintiff’s identity. They elected three representatives and asked the court to adjudicate the approval of the Planning Bureau to approve the administrative act of establishing a residential area on the north side of the square. In this case, the lawsuit filed on the ground that the environmental rights and interests of the unspecified majority of people have been brought brought many reflections: Are these Qingdao citizens enjoying the status of plaintiff and thus obtaining the plaintiff status (whether the court accepts the case)? Can beautiful environmental rights and interests be recognized by the courts and protected by law?