论文部分内容阅读
目的观察阿奇霉素两种不同疗法在治疗小儿支原体肺炎中疗效-成本的优势。方法选自2007年1月至2009年12月我科确诊为支原体肺炎患儿192例,随机分为两组,分别给予阿奇霉素序贯及传统治疗方法,观察两组在疗效、住院天数、治疗费用方面的差异。结果两组患儿在咳嗽缓解时间、体温恢复时间及胸片正常时间上比较差异均无统计学意义,但观察组在住院天数及治疗总费用上明显优于对照组;且阿奇霉素序贯疗法因其简便、痛苦小而易被患儿及家长所接受。结论阿奇霉素序贯疗法治疗小儿支原体肺炎是一种经济、有效、实用的治疗方法。
Objective To observe the efficacy of two different therapies of azithromycin in the treatment of children with mycoplasma pneumonia - the advantage of cost. Methods From January 2007 to December 2009, 192 patients with mycoplasma pneumonia were randomly divided into two groups and given azithromycin sequential and traditional treatment respectively. The curative effect, hospitalization days, treatment cost The difference. Results The two groups of children in the cough relief time, body temperature recovery time and the normal time of chest X-ray showed no significant difference, but the observation group in hospitalization days and the total cost of treatment was significantly better than the control group; and azithromycin sequential therapy Its simple, painful and easily accepted by children and parents. Conclusion Sequential azithromycin treatment of children with mycoplasma pneumonia is an economical, effective and practical treatment.