近日,微博用户“法治路由器”发布了两份案号相同的立案受理通知书,以“法院造假案,有图有真相”为题,称榆阳区法院伪造案卷。对于当事人就案卷的签名作假多处疑点提出的质疑,法院方面回应称“可能是书记员订卷时他觉得差材料他就补了,(也)可能后来是实习生干的。(据中国广播网)有没有伪造案卷,从日期上的矛盾、笔迹的伪造等方面,已经很清楚地给出了答案,任何狡辩 Recently, microblogging users ”Rule of Law router “ released two cases with the same case acceptance notice to ”court fraud case, there is a picture of the truth “ in the title, said Yuyang District Court forged file. In response to questions raised by the parties about many doubts about the signature of the case file, the court responded that ”he may have made up the poor material when he wrote the book, and (maybe) later became an intern." (According to China Broadcast network) has forged the file, from the date of contradictions, forgery and other aspects of handwriting, has been very clearly given the answer, any sophistry