论文部分内容阅读
2011年1月,河南平顶山“天价高速收费事件”经媒体曝光后,立刻成为社会热点,并引起河南省高院党组高度重视,在平顶山中院启动再审程序的同时,相关审判人员被闪电问责①。姑且不论在中院启动再审程序,按照一审程序重新审理时,省高院就闪电追责审判法院的做法是否妥当,和“邓玉娇故意伤害”、“孙伟铭醉酒驾驶”等事件一样,“天
In January 2011, Pingdingshan, Henan Province, ”high price high-speed charges“ after the media exposure, immediately became a social hot spot, and led to the Henan Provincial High Court party attaches great importance to the trial in Pingdingshan Intermediate Court retrial procedures, the relevant trial staff were lightning Accountability ①. Regardless of the initiation of retrial proceedings in the Intermediate Court and the reopening of proceedings in accordance with the first instance, the Provincial Supreme People’s Court held that it is appropriate for the Provincial Supreme People’s Court to follow the trial of the lightning by lightning, as in the case of ”Intentional Injury by Deng Yujiao“ and ”Drunken Driving by Sun Weizeng“ ”day