论文部分内容阅读
本文从如何选择申诉对象、如何选择解决争端的方式以及如何选择解决争端的法庭这三个方面对WTO成员处理多边贸易摩擦的选择行为进行了研究,发现:经济动机和策略动机共同决定了WTO成员对申诉对象的选择;策略性因素和规范性力量影响着WTO成员对争端解决手段的选择;出口市场的重要性、经济实力和经济自由化程度的对比关系决定了WTO成员具体选择哪一个法庭来解决与贸易伙伴间的摩擦。
This article studies the choices of WTO members in handling multilateral trade frictions from three aspects: how to choose the appellant, how to choose the way to resolve the dispute and how to choose the court to settle the dispute. It is found that economic motivation and strategic motivation jointly determine the WTO members The choice of object of appeal; strategic factors and normative forces affect the choice of WTO members on the means of dispute settlement; the importance of the export market, the economic strength and the degree of economic liberalization determine the specific choice of which WTO members to come to court Solve the friction with trading partners.