论文部分内容阅读
在特定条件下终结案件的本次执行程序强调的是执行的程序性终结,体现了执行的效率与经济。但由于执行程序的暂时终结,导致申请执行人执行请求权的中断,其实体权利并未真正得到实现,故在发现被执行人有可供执行财产时,其可通过依申请或者由执行法院依职权恢复执行,体现了执行的公平与正义。公正在法律上的第二个意义是指效率,按照法经济学理论,公正与效率是矛盾统一体,没有效率的公正或者失去公正的效率都是没有意义的。实际上,民事执行案件的再执行程序同样蕴含了执行过程中“三角主体”间的博弈,体现为公正与效率间的较量。若进入再执行程序的案件仍未发现被执行人有可供执行财产的,则理应再次退出执行程序,形成的是再执行程序“启动—运行—再退出”的反复循环,体现了公正与效率之间反复博弈与较量的过程,以最终达到两者间的均衡。考虑到执行的效率与经济,以及被执行人恢复履行能力的不可预见性,本文将以W=What(范围)、Who(主体)、Why(原因),H=How(形式)为角度,并以执行效率优先兼顾执行公正为原则,在制度上设定再执行程序启动与运行的次数、时间间隔与条件等,从而设计民事执行案件的实质退出机制。对那些在一定时效与条件下仍执行不能的民事执行案件彻底退出执行程序,让司法资源得以高效利用以及让被执行人免于遭受无了期的职权干预,是维护社会秩序稳定与法律秩序安定的理念要求。
This implementation of the procedure to terminate the case under certain conditions emphasizes the procedural end of implementation and reflects the efficiency and economy of implementation. However, due to the temporary termination of the execution procedure, the execution of the application executor is interrupted. Therefore, the substantive rights have not really been realized. Therefore, when it is found that the enforced person has the property available for execution, The resumption of the exercise of power reflects the fairness and justice of implementation. The second legal meaning of justice is efficiency. According to the theory of law and economics, justice and efficiency are contradictory unions, and there is no point in the inefficiency or the loss of fair efficiency. In fact, the procedure for the re-execution of civil execution cases also implies the game between the “triangular subjects” in the implementation process and the contest between fairness and efficiency. If the cases entering the reecution process still fail to find the assets available for execution, the reemergent should once again withdraw from the execution procedure, resulting in a repetitive cycle of re-execution of the procedure “start-run-re-exit” And the process of repeated games between the game and the contest in order to eventually achieve a balance between the two. Taking into account the efficiency and economy of implementation and the unpredictability of the enforcee’s ability to perform resumed, this article will be based on W = What, Who, Why, H = How, In order to implement the principle of giving priority to efficiency and giving consideration to the implementation of fairness, the mechanism should be designed to set the actual exit procedures for civil enforcement cases by setting the number, time interval and conditions of starting and running the re-execution of the procedures on a system basis. For those civil execution cases that can not be implemented under certain conditions of time and conditions, the complete withdrawal of execution procedures, the efficient use of judicial resources and the avoidance of those who have been subjected to indefinite authority interference are the measures to safeguard the stability of the social order and the stability of the legal order The concept of requirements.