论文部分内容阅读
法律解释是伴随着法律适用而发生的现象,法律实施官员将抽象的法律规范运用到具体个案中,必然会对法律规范的内容和含义进行理解、阐明。因此,法律解释作为一项司法技术,必然包含在审判权之中。但是,长期以来,我国对法律解释的理解和制度上的定位出现了偏差,将法律解释异化为一种相对独立的权力并为国家机关所垄断,剥夺了法官等法律适用者的个案法律解释权。在上述理念的指导下,我国针对刑事诉讼法的解释形成了具有中国特色的解释体制,即以立法解释和司法解释为主要内容、以细则化立法为主要表现形式、以排除法官的个案法律解释权为主要特征的解释体制。这一体制存在诸多弊端,影响了其应有功能的发挥。笔者着重分析了现行刑事诉讼法解释体制的现状,包括它的基本内容、运行状况和机理缺陷,并在此基础上为改造刑事诉讼法解释体制进行了初步的探索。
Legal interpretation is a phenomenon that occurs with the application of law. When law enforcement officials apply abstract legal norms to specific cases, they are bound to understand and clarify the content and meaning of legal norms. Therefore, legal interpretation as a judicial technique must be included in the jurisdiction. However, for a long time, our understanding of the legal interpretation and institutional positioning deviation, the legal interpretation of alienation into a relatively independent power and the monopoly of state organs, deprived of judges and other law applicable case of legal interpretation . Guided by the above ideas, our country’s interpretation of the Code of Criminal Procedure has formed a system of interpretation with Chinese characteristics, namely, legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation as the main content, with the elaboration of the legislation as the main form to exclude the judge’s case law interpretation As the main feature of the right to explain the system. This system has many drawbacks and affects its due functions. The author analyzes emphatically the current situation of the interpretation system of criminal procedural law, including its basic content, operational status and mechanism flaws, and on this basis, it makes a preliminary exploration for transforming the interpretation system of criminal procedural law.