论文部分内容阅读
针对化学防治农药用量大、害虫易产生抗药性、果品质量无保障、环境污染严重的缺点,对迷向防治、果实套袋防治和化学防治对苹果蠹蛾的防控效果进行比较试验。结果表明,迷向防治区、套袋防治区、药剂防治区苹果蠹蛾成虫诱集量分别降低92.4%、85.6%、90.7%,蛀果率分别降低100.0%、99.3%、98.4%。从经济和生态效益出发,应将套袋作为防治苹果蠹蛾的首选措施;对不易套袋的地区,可采用迷向措施防治苹果蠹蛾。
In view of the large amount of chemical control pesticides, the pest easy to produce drug resistance, the quality of the fruit of non-guaranteed, serious environmental pollution shortcomings, the prevention and control of the fan, fruit bagging control and chemical control of codling moth prevention and control effects were compared. The results showed that adults trapped in codling control zone, bagging control zone and medicament control zone decreased by 92.4%, 85.6% and 90.7%, respectively, and bore rate decreased by 100.0%, 99.3% and 98.4%, respectively. From economic and ecological benefits, bagging should be used as the preferred measure to control codling moth. For areas not easily bagged, the caterpillar can be used to control codling moth.