论文部分内容阅读
约翰 霍根自以为他的著作《科学的终结》“睿智、全面、引人入胜”,但他不得不承认他这本书的不足之处,首先是“几乎完全没有女性的声音。”我们的这本《科技》杂志似乎存在着同样的问题。在我们收到的读者调查表中,95％来自男性,女读者只占5％。在科学技术方面,富有理性思维的男性似乎永远比直觉聪颖的女性有着更多的兴趣。但不管怎么说,毕竟仍有一些女同胞对我们第一期改版的杂志作了热烈的回应,这使我们觉得自己更应该象她们期待的那样走进生活,并增加女性关心的内容。 读者调查表的统计数字,在某种程度上
John Hogan thought he was “wise, comprehensive and engaging” in his book The End of Science, but he had to admit that he was short on the book, starting with “There was almost no female voice.” Our book It seems that the same issue exists in Science and Technology magazine. Of the readership surveys we received, 95% came from men and only 5% from women. In science and technology, men with rational thinking seem to have always been more interested than intuitive, intelligent women. However, after all, there are still some female compatriots who have responded enthusiastically to the first edition of our magazine. This makes us feel that we should walk into their lives more than they expected and increase the content that women care about. Readers’ statistics, to some extent