康德关于经验可能性的普遍与必然条件的绝对主义的论断,应放在其批判哲学目标的更宽泛的语境中加以理解。可以看到,在相关的语境中,康德的论断相当大程度上并非如传统的观点所认为的那样是非常有害的。康德强调他对于“常识”的深深敬重,就哲学能够提供什么,或至少重要的是,在哲学不能提供什么方面,康德与维特根斯坦所持的目标惊人地相似。 Kant’s assertion of absolutism about the universality and inevitability of the possibility of experience should be understood in the broader context of its critical philosophical goals. It can be seen that Kant’s assertion, to a large extent, is not very detrimental in the relevant context, as the conventional wisdom suggests. Kant emphasizes his deep respect for “common sense ”, what philosophy can offer, or at least importantly, Kant’s and Wittgenstein’s goals are strikingly similar to what philosophy can not provide.