论文部分内容阅读
8“君之所以患于军者”何以为“三”?《孙子·谋攻》总“君之所以患于军者”为三,然从分说(不知军之不可以进而谓之进,不知军之不可以退而谓之退,是谓縻军;不知三军之事而同三军之政者,则军士惑矣;不知三军之权而同三军之任,则军士疑矣。三军既惑且疑,则诸侯之难至矣。是谓乱军引胜。)指出的情况划分,却非二则四,“三”由何出,实在费解!古人为文,相当讲究句法齐整,所以从文中两次出现“是谓……”来看,君为患于军者当为“二”:前两句说的是一种情况,即所谓“縻军”;后两句说的是另一种情况,即所谓“乱军引胜”。这是一种划分法。如果把前两
8 “The reason why the king is suffering from military” “Three ”? “The grandson of the attack” total “The reason why the king is suffering from the military” for the three, but from the points Can be further said that the advance, I do not know the military can not retreat and that of the retreat, is called the Turks; I do not know the things of the armed forces with the Three Corps of the government, the sergeant confused; I do not know the power of the Three Forces and the Three Forces, the sergeant Suspected carry on .Because the armed forces both confused and doubt, then the princes of the difficulties to carry on .It refers to the chaos army to win.) Points out that the situation is divided, but not two four, “three” by what, it is hard to understand! , Quite pay attention to the syntactic integrity, so from the article appeared twice “is the so-called ... ” point of view, the king for the suffering army as “two ”: the first two sentences is a situation that the so-called 縻 Army “; the latter two said another case, the so-called ” chaos army to win ". This is a division method. If the first two