论文部分内容阅读
礼让说作为一种国际私法学说,其最初的理论基础是国家主权利益之冲突。基于这一视角,梳理礼让说在美国冲突法理论界和判例法中的发展脉络,可以得出这样的结论:礼让说在美国理论界和判例法中大致都经历了一个从肯定、否定到否定之否定的历史循环之进程。但该循环并非简单机械的重复,当代美国理论界在把礼让的基础重新定位于国家主权利益之冲突之上的同时,关注重心从“为何适用外国法律”转向到“怎样选择法律”的层面之上。礼让说在美国的发展和嬗变对我国国际私法的重要启示意义在于:我国外国法的适用理论的构建应该建立在坚持国家主权独立和尊重他国国家主权的前提和基础之上,同时应注重提高法院的效率,便利国际贸易和促进国际关系的发展。
As a doctrine of international private law, commencing from courtesy, its initial theoretical basis is the conflict between the interests of national sovereignty. Based on this perspective, combing the development of politeness in the theorists and jurisprudence of conflict law in the United States leads to the conclusion that politeness has generally experienced a shift from affirmation, negation to case law in the American theoretical and case law The process of negation of the historical cycle. However, this cycle is not simply a mechanical repetition. While contemporary American theoretical circles are reorienting the basis of comity on the conflicts of national sovereignty interests, they focus their attention on how to choose the law from “why foreign law applies” to “how to choose law” "Above the level. The significance of comity and development in the United States for the development of private international law in China lies in the following aspects: The construction of the applicable theory of foreign law in our country should be based on the premise and foundation of upholding the sovereignty of the country and respecting the sovereignty of other countries. At the same time, Efficiency, facilitate international trade and promote the development of international relations.