1.对“文化帝国主义”的不同态度以拉美哲学协会主席、墨西哥哲学家L.塞亚为代表的拉美学派早就提出要对“文化帝国主义”这一新的哲学问题进行讨论。而以欧洲中心思想为哲学标准的美国哲学界提出了截然不同的观点和看法。美国哲学家R.罗蒂认为,“根本不存在一种文化帝国主义”。哲学“是由于帝国的发展而可能实现的‘自由飞地’,但它决不意味着‘飞地’与帝国主义之间存在着某种联系”。他还认为,“哲学与政治实践毫不相干,如果涉及政治实践,也仅指希望而言。在压迫的条件下,哲学毫无用处。所以,拉美的不发达阶层不可能创造出任何一种值得评价的哲学”。完全代表美国哲学界英欧中心论(angloeurocén- 1. Different attitudes toward “cultural imperialism” The Latin American school, represented by the president of the Latin American Philosophy Association and Mexican Mexican philosopher L. Seya, has long proposed to discuss the new philosophical issue of “cultural imperialism.” The American philosophical circles based on the European central idea put forward completely different views and opinions. According to R. Rorty, an American philosopher, “there is no such thing as a cultural imperialism at all.” Philosophy “is a” free enclave “that may be realized due to the development of the empire. However, it does not in any way mean that there is a certain connection between ’enclave’ and imperialism. ’ He also believes that ”philosophy and political practice are irrelevant, and if it involves political practice, it refers only to hope, and philosophy is useless under oppression.“ Therefore, Latin American underdeveloped classes can not create any kind Worthy of evaluation philosophy. ” Completely representative of the American philosophical center of Anglo-European theory (angloeurocén-