论文部分内容阅读
借助ESI数据库和InCites数据库从科研生产力和科研影响力两方面对中国“C9”联盟高校和澳大利亚“G8”联盟高校的学科进行评价。首先,采用ESI数据库分析“C9”和“G8”高校进入ESI前1%的学科;其次,借助InCites数据库分析高校学科的科研生产力和科研影响力;最后,从整体角度分析优势学科结构分布。研究显示:“C9”和“G8”高校分别有135和151个学科进入ESI前1%,“C9”高校科研生产力已超过“G8”高校,但科研影响力却与“G8”高校存在较大差距,同时“C9”和“G8”高校分别呈现出不同的学科分布群。因此,平衡高校学科的科研生产力和科研影响力,加强机构之间的合作,能够有效地促进高等学校一流学科的建设。
Using the ESI database and InCites database, we evaluate the disciplines of universities in China “C9 ” and Australia “G8 ” alliance from the aspects of research productivity and scientific research influence. First of all, using the ESI database to analyze 1% of the subjects in the “C9 ” and “G8 ” universities entering the ESI; secondly, using InCites database to analyze the scientific research productivity and scientific research influence of the university disciplines; finally, analyzing the dominant disciplines Structure distribution. The research shows that 135 universities and 151 colleges respectively have 1% and 1% of ESI before the “C9” and “G8” colleges and universities, while “C9” colleges and universities have surpassed “G8” colleges and universities, but the research influence There is a big gap between “G8” and “G8” universities. At the same time, “C9” and “G8” colleges show different disciplinary distribution groups respectively. Therefore, balancing scientific research productivity and scientific research influence of university disciplines and strengthening cooperation among institutions can effectively promote the construction of first-rate disciplines in higher education institutions.