论文部分内容阅读
2002年10月29日上午,一场索赔额高达237.7万元的医疗事故人身损害赔偿纠纷上诉案在某省高级人民法院公开审理。原告为任小刚(化名),7岁,系东北某城市人(由其法定代理人代为出庭参加诉讼),被告为所在城市妇女儿童医院。 如果本案发生在颁布了《《医疗事故处理条例》的2002年9月1日之后,又该如何进行医疗事故鉴定呢,是否会导致完全不同的处理结果?而新旧鉴定程序究竟有哪些不同? 《当代医学》为你邀请嘉润律师事务所的专业律师,对这起东北最大医患纠纷案进行点评和分析,希望能帮助身为医院高层管理者的您,从专业角度理解医疗事故技术鉴定的新变化。
On the morning of October 29, 2002, a petition for personal injury compensation for medical malpractice claims amounting to 2,377,000 yuan was heard in a high court in a province. The plaintiff, Ren Xiaogang (not his real name), aged 7, is a city in northeast China (litigated by his legal representative on his behalf) and the defendant is the city’s Women and Children’s Hospital. If this case happened after the promulgation of the “Regulations on Medical Malpractice” after September 1, 2002, how to conduct a medical malpractice assessment would lead to completely different treatment results? What are the differences between the new and the old appraisal procedures? “ Contemporary Medicine ”invited you to Jiarun Law Firm, a professional lawyer, on the northeastern largest doctor-patient dispute case review and analysis, hoping to help as a hospital manager, you from a professional point of view of medical malpractice technology appraisal New changes.