术中~(125)I粒子植入与高能电子线放射治疗晚期胰腺癌的比较

来源 :中日友好医院学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:gggmtdh2009
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较分析术中125I粒子植入与高能电子线放射治疗晚期胰腺癌的临床疗效。方法:对手术不能切除的晚期胰腺癌用125I放射性粒子术中植入组织间内照射(A组)10例,用高能电子线术中照射(B组)50例。比较两组治疗后的生存情况及止痛有效率。结果:中位生存期A组4.6个月,B组6.5个月。6个月、12个月生存率A组分别为40%、10%,B组为62%、52%(P<0.01)。止痛有效率A组为60%,B组为80%(P<0.05)。结论:术中125I粒子植入的治疗效果不如高能电子线放射治疗的主要原因是术中直视下的放射性粒子盲插种植入技术精确度不高。按照治疗计划精确完成放射性粒子的空间分布是提高术中125I粒子植入疗效的关键。 Objective: To comparatively analyze the clinical effect of intraoperative 125I implantation and high energy electron beam radiation in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Ten patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with intraluminal irradiation of 125I radioactive particles (group A) and 50 patients with high - energy electron beam irradiation (group B). After treatment, the survival and analgesic efficiency were compared between the two groups. Results: The median survival time in group A was 4.6 months and in group B 6.5 months. The 6-month and 12-month survival rates were 40% and 10% in group A, 62% and 52% in group B (P <0.01). Analgesia effective rate was 60% in group A and 80% in group B (P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative 125I particle implantation is less effective than high energy electron beam radiation therapy because the accuracy of blind insertion of radioactive particles under direct vision is not high. Accurately completing the spatial distribution of radioactive particles in accordance with the treatment plan is the key to improving the efficacy of intraoperative 125I particle implantation.
其他文献
五年来,由河南李紫剑先生发起的对王芗斋先生及其所创大成拳的问疑,从《武魂》杂志到《轨迹拳学》教材,再到互联网,时不时地出现在广大武友面前。每一次<问疑》的公开亮相,均引起一阵七嘴八舌的回应,夹杂着一些不堪入耳的辱骂。接着李先生也出言不逊,胡嚼乱骂。双方的这种泼妇骂街式的争论据我看来实在有辱广大武友的耳目,不值得提倡。笔者久历武林,与大成拳家、轨迹拳宗师书信来往不止一次,两家拳学亦均有涉猎,今不揣冒