论文部分内容阅读
1926年,中国共产党在蒋介石等新老右派的三次反革命进攻面前实施了三次大退让,特别是在“整理党务案”上向蒋介石的妥协退让,客观上为蒋介石叛变革命、把革命打入血泊中提供了条件。面对这一结果,共产国际及其驻中国的代表应负主要的领导责任。因为,妥协符合共产国际和苏联共产党当时的对华政策,“整理党务案”的大多数内容都得到了共产国际和鲍罗廷的认可,甚至是鲍罗廷与蒋介石协商的结果。造成这一局面的原因主要在于共产国际代表错误地分析了当时的阶级状况,过高地估计了国民党和资产阶级的革命性和力量,而对中共和中国无产阶级的力量估计不足。
In 1926, the Chinese Communist Party implemented three big concessions in the face of the three counterrevolutionary attacks by Chiang Kai-shek and other new and old right-wingers. In particular, he gave a compromise and concession to Chiang Kai-shek on the issue of “Party Organizing for Democracy,” and objectively trashed the revolution for Chiang Kai-shek and revolutionized Blood pool provides the conditions. In the face of this result, the leaders of the Comintern and its representatives in China have the primary leadership responsibility. Because the compromise was in line with the current policy toward China of the Comintern and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, most of the contents of the “Order of Party Organizations” were endorsed by the Comintern and Borodin and even by the consultation between Borodin and Chiang Kai-shek. The reason for this situation lies in the fact that the representatives of the Comintern made a false analysis of the class status at that time, overestimated the revolutionary and strength of the Kuomintang and the bourgeoisie, and underestimated the power of the CPC and the Chinese proletariat.