论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察神经衰弱患者实施优质护理的效果。方法:将100例神经衰弱患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各50例。对照组患者给予常规护理;观察组患者给予优质护理。应用焦虑自评量表和自制满意度调查量表对两组患者的焦虑评分及满意度进行评定,并比较。结果:护理后,两组患者的焦虑评分均低于护理前(P<0.05)。观察组患者的焦虑评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05),对护理的满意度明显优于对照组(P<0.05),两组患者的差异有统计学意义。结论:给予神经衰弱患者优质护理的效果优于常规护理。
Objective: To observe the effect of quality nursing in patients with neurasthenia. Methods: 100 cases of neurasthenic patients were divided into observation group and control group, 50 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were given routine care; patients in the observation group were given quality care. The self-rating anxiety scale and self-made satisfaction questionnaire were used to assess the anxiety scores and satisfaction of the two groups of patients, and compared. Results: After nursing, anxiety scores in both groups were lower than before nursing (P <0.05). The anxiety score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P <0.05), and the satisfaction with nursing was significantly better than that in the control group (P <0.05). There was significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: The effect of quality care on neurasthenic patients is better than that of routine nursing care.