论文部分内容阅读
目的研究谷红注射液与疏血通注射液治疗脑血栓的临床疗效。方法 86例脑血栓患者,采用随机数字表法分为疏血通组(44例)和谷红组(42例)。疏血通组采用疏血通注射液治疗;谷红组采用谷红注射液治疗。观察比较两组临床疗效及治疗前后患者神经功能缺损评分差异。结果谷红组总有效率为95.24%,高于疏血通组的70.45%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗前两组神经功能缺损评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后谷红组神经功能缺损改善程度明显优于疏血通组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论谷红注射液治疗脑血栓的临床疗效较疏血通注射液更好,改善神经功能的效果更显著,值得推广。
Objective To study the clinical efficacy of Gu-Hong injection and Shuxuetong injection in the treatment of cerebral thrombosis. Methods Totally 86 patients with cerebral thrombosis were divided into Shuxuetong group (44 cases) and Gu-hong group (42 cases) by random number table. Shuxuetong group using Shuxuetong injection treatment; Gu Hong group Gugu injection treatment. The clinical efficacy and neurological deficit score of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The total effective rate of GuZhong group was 95.24%, which was higher than that of Shuxuetong group (70.45%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in neurological deficit score between the two groups before treatment (P> 0.05 ). After treatment, the improvement of neurological deficit in Gu-Liang group was better than that of Shuxuentong, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Gu-Hong injection of cerebral thrombosis clinical efficacy than Shuxuetong injection better, to improve neurological effects more pronounced, it is worth promoting.