论文部分内容阅读
仲裁制度本身的局限性、既判力主观范围的扩张使得仲裁案外人利益受到影响。仲裁第三人制度损害了仲裁制度的协议基础,申请撤销仲裁裁决制度中案外人不具有主体资格且难以救济其实体性权利,再审制度属于典型的监督性再审,不利于仲裁制度的自治性、自愿性、秘密性的保障,三者均缺乏可行性。案外人撤销仲裁裁决之诉避免了案外人直接参与仲裁程序,同时对案外人的实体性权利能有效救济,具有其正当性和可行性。
The limitation of the arbitration system itself and the expansion of the subjective scope of the res judicata have affected the interests of outsiders in the arbitration case. The system of arbitration third party undermines the basis of the agreement of the arbitration system. When applying for revoking the arbitral award system, the outsider does not have the qualification of the main body and it is difficult to remedy the substantive rights. The retrial system is a typical supervisory retrial and is not conducive to the autonomy of the arbitration system. Voluntary, confidential security, all three are not feasible. It is justifiable and feasible that an outsider’s decision to revoke an arbitration award avoids the outsider’s direct participation in the arbitration proceedings while effectively remedying the substantive rights of the outsider.