论文部分内容阅读
目的 探究分析不同气道湿化护理干预方法对气管切开患者的价值对比.方法 根据护理方法的不同将保定市第一中心医院收治的110例进行气管切开的患者随机分为观察组(持续气道雾化法)和对照组(间断气道雾化法).比较两组患者护理干预后的效果、湿化满意度、并发症(肺部感染、气管损伤、气道出血、刺激性咳嗽、痰痂、痰栓)的发生情况.结果 观察组出现呼吸道感染、未愈出院及病情恶化的患者明显少于对照组;观察组护理干预后的治愈出院患者数明显多于对照组(P<0.05).观察组湿化不足和湿化过度的患者都明显少于对照组;观察组对湿化满意患者明显高于对照组(P<0.05).观察组患者的肺部感染、气管损伤、气道出血、刺激性咳嗽、痰痂、痰栓等并发症发生情况和总发生率都明显低于对照组(P<0.05).结论 对气管切开的患者使用持续气道湿化进行护理干预,效果明显,患者对于湿化的满意度高,还能减少并发症的发生,值得在临床上推广.“,”Objective To explore the value of different airway humidification nursing intervention for patients with tracheotomy.Methods According to the different nursing methods, 110 patients who underwent tracheotomy in our hospital without mechanical treatment were divided into observation group and control group. The observation group was treated with continuous airway atomization, and the control group was treated with intermittent airway atomization and Analysis and comparison of two groups of patients after nursing intervention treatment, humidification satisfaction, complications (pulmonary infection, tracheal injury, airway bleeding, irritating cough, sputum, sputum embolism) occurred and the incidence of discomfort.. Results The number of observation group after the nursing of respiratory tract infection, and the discharged condition worsened significantly less than the control group;the observation group nursing intervention after cured number was higher than that of control group (P<0.05). The patients in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, and the patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The observation group of patients with pulmonary infection, tracheal injury, airway bleeding, irritating cough, sputum, sputum embolism and other complications were significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05), the total incidence rate of the complications in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). The number of patients in observation group was more than that in control group (P<0.05). The incidence of discomfort and discomfort in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The use of continuous airway humidification method of nursing intervention on patients with tracheal incision nursing, can significantly improve the therapeutic effect, increase patients for humidification satisfaction, reduce complications and discomfort, it is worth promoting in clinical practice.