论文部分内容阅读
我国司法实践普遍承认提单的物权效力。在我国的民法理论中,也有将提单交付拟制成货物交付的观点,此已为不争之事实。但是我国《海商法》并未明确规定提单物权效力。当然在《海商法》中的提单制度中包含了一些提单物权效力制度。为明确法律关系消除分岐,我国法律应以明文规定提单物权效力的概念,制定有关提单物权效力的条款。
Judicial practice in our country generally acknowledges the validity of the property of bill of lading. In our country’s civil law theory, there is also the idea of delivering the bill of lading to deliver the goods to be delivered, which is an indisputable fact. However, China’s “Maritime Law” does not specify the validity of bill of lading property rights. Of course, in the “Maritime Law” in the bill of lading system includes a number of bill of lading property rights system. To clarify the legal relationship between the disagreement, our law should expressly provide the concept of the validity of the bill of lading real right to make provisions on the validity of the bill of lading property rights.