论文部分内容阅读
基于一事不再理原则,诉讼不得以同一事件或争点重复提出。加拿大判例确立的禁止重复诉讼适用标准避免了对相同事件或争点的重复诉讼和反复判断。禁止重复诉讼判例规则的适用固然有维护法律安定和权威之功效,但是过于机械地将其绝对化,也会损害诉讼公正性。因此,加拿大已存的禁止重复诉讼判例规则不可能尽善尽美和一成不变,而是处于不断发展和演变之中。加拿大的一些重要案例,不仅展示了禁止重复诉讼规则的识别标准,也反映了其演变过程。本文试就加拿大禁止重复诉讼规则的适用标准及其演变作一介绍和分析,以期为我国提供参考和借鉴。
Based on the principle of non-preference, litigation may not be repeated with the same issue or issue. The Canadian prohibition of double standards established by the precedent avoids repetitive litigation and repeated judgments on the same matter or issue. The Prohibition of Repeated Litigation The application of the rules of the precedent does have the effect of safeguarding the stability and authority of the law. However, if it is mechanically too absolute, it will also impair the fairness of the lawsuit. Therefore, Canada’s existing rules on the Prohibition of Repeated Litigation can not be perfect and immutable, but are constantly evolving and evolving. Some important Canadian cases show not only the standards of recognition of the rules prohibiting repetition of litigation, but also their evolution. This paper tries to introduce and analyze the applicable standards and the evolution of Canada’s Prohibition of Repeated Litigation Rules in order to provide reference and reference for our country.