癫痫迄今在国际上还缺乏一致公认的定义和分类,因此在方法学上难于相互比较。本文根据国内1983年和1985年先后在长沙等五城市及哈尔滨等21省(市)农村进行的大规模神经流行病学调查结果进行对比分析,现报告如下。 材料与方法 按照地理位置,选定长沙、成都、广州、哈尔滨、银川五城市为城市组,在相距20公里的乡村为农村组。两地区各随机选择含有一万余名自然社区人群为研究样本,共计城市人群:54144人,农村人群58518人。具有该地区正式城市或农村户口居民为调查对象。调查方式每两人一组,均经过统一的技术培训,并有神经科医生参加,进行逐户家访,实查率城市、农村 Epilepsy has so far lacked internationally recognized definitions and classifications, and therefore it is difficult to compare methods with one another. This article compares and analyzes the results of large-scale neuro epidemiological surveys conducted in 1983 and 1985 in the five cities of Changsha and other 21 provinces (cities) in Harbin. The report is as follows. Materials and Methods According to geographical location, five cities of Changsha, Chengdu, Guangzhou, Harbin, and Yinchuan were selected as urban groups, and villages 20 kilometers apart were rural groups. In the two regions, randomly selected 10,000 natural community populations were selected as research samples, involving a total of 54144 urban people and 58,518 rural people. Residents who have a formal city or rural household registration in the area are the subjects of the survey. The survey method was used by every two people. All of them were trained in a unified technique, and there were neurologists participating in the visits. Household visits were conducted. The actual investigation rate was in urban and rural areas.