《民事诉讼法》增加规定了诉前证据保全制度,在一定程度上完善了该制度;但我国诉前证据保全制度需要进一步法典化和系统化。诉前证据保全应由证据所在地的人民法院或者对案件实体问题有管辖权的人民法院管辖。采取查封、扣押证据保全方法时,应将申请人提供担保作为诉前证据保全成立的要件;采取其他证据保全方法时,申请人是否提供担保,应由法院自由裁量。在国内的一般民事纠纷中,不应承认采取诉前证据保全措施的人民法院因采取诉前证据保全措施而取得对案件实体问题的管辖权;但在海事纠纷和涉外民事纠纷中,应当承认采取查封、扣押诉前证据保全措施的人民法院享有案件实体问题的管辖权。 The “Civil Procedure Law” added a pre-appeal evidence preservation system, to a certain extent, perfected the system; However, China’s pre-litigation evidence preservation system needs to be further codified and systematized. The preservation of evidence before the prosecution shall be governed by the people’s court where the evidence is located or the people’s court that has jurisdiction over the substantive matter of the case. When seizing and seizing evidence preservation methods, the applicant shall provide the guarantee as the prerequisite for the establishment of evidence preservation; and when applying other methods for the preservation of evidence, whether the applicant provides guarantee shall be subject to discretion of the court. In domestic civil disputes in general, people’s courts adopting pre-trial evidence preservation measures should not be allowed to gain jurisdiction over the substantive issues of cases because of the pre-trial evidence preservation measures. However, in maritime disputes and foreign-related civil disputes, The people’s court that has sealed up or detained the evidence preservation measures before the lawsuit has the jurisdiction over the substantive matter of the case.