十几二十年前,我们便知道有一个起自法国,热衷于“拆散”,“消解”和“颠覆”的哲学思潮,名曰“后结构主义。巴尔特、福柯、拉康、利奥塔、P·索勒斯、J·德里达.这一串名字也是不陌生的。但,这个“主义”当年似乎不大叫座。现在,还是这批人,也还是这些理论.换了一套眩目的时装再上场,叫“后现代主义”了,不想立刻博得满堂掌声 其实,质疑“宏大叙事” 或解构事物逻辑结构也罢,颠覆“形而上学传统”也好,无非只是哲学主张之一种。平心而论,推崇“异质”,信奉“多元”,多做做维特根斯坦式的语言游戏,也很可能有助于防止文化的僵化。但令人始料所不及的是.“后现代”本来高举的是破除任何迷信的大森,在时下的中国反而成了一种新的迷信。这种橘化为枳的变味,是不是会令法国的德里达们感到尴尬呢? 这里刊发有关“后现代主义”以及拼贴绘画的文章,当然并不意味着这是定论,我们更希望由此触发进一步的思考。 特邀主持人/梁江 A dozen or twenty years ago, we knew of a philosophical trend of thought that began in France and was passionate about “breaking up,” “digestion,” and “subversion,” and called “post-structuralism.” Barthes, Foucault, Lacan, Horta, P.Solles, J · Derrida is also no stranger to the string of names, but this “doctrine” does not seem to shout .Now, these people, but also these theories. In fact, the question of “grand narrative” or the logical structure of deconstruction matter or subversion of “metaphysical tradition” is more than just a philosophical proposition. In all fairness, respected “heterogeneity”, believe in “diversity”, do more Wittgenstein language games, is also likely to help prevent cultural rigidity .But unexpected is that “postmodern” would have been Exalted is to get rid of any superstition of Omori, China nowadays has become a new superstition on the contrary, this orange into trifoliate odors, is not it will make the French Derrida feel embarrassed? Here published “after Modernism ”and collage painting Draw the article, of course, does not mean that this is a conclusion, we hope to trigger further thinking invited guest / Liang Jiang