论文部分内容阅读
对于研究不同种类的副词,句法制图方法卓有成效。但对近义副词来说,语用学分析可以发掘出更重要的语言事实。以上古汉语不确定语气副词为例,它们在主语前或主语后、副词并用、两项副词连用的排序、进入从句、移位方面的表现参差,捕捉不到整齐的规律;如果从信息渠道、主观性(褒贬和信疑)、语体等方面审视,不确定语气副词内部有区分,这些话语层面的区分与语气副词的意义、构成方式有关,也有一套语法形式的佐证(如:对人称、语气、句式的选择)。
For the study of different types of adverbs, syntax drawing method is fruitful. However, for near-adverbial adverbs, pragmatic analysis can reveal more important linguistic facts. Taking the examples above, the adverbs of uncertain sentiment in ancient Chinese as an example, they are used in front of the subject or after the subject, and the adverbs are used together. Subjectivity (praise and disbelief and suspicion), style and other aspects of the review, there is a distinction between the tone of the adverbs of uncertainty, the distinction between the level of these discourses and modal adverbs, the composition of the way, there is a set of grammatical evidence (such as: Tone, sentence choice).