清代三家诗学,历来论者甚众。学者多以汉代三家诗的原貌为标准,考较清人辑佚之得失。本文区分汉代三家诗本身和清人辑佚三家诗的成果,纯粹以辑佚学的内部视角,探索陈乔枞、王先谦的不同思路,指出陈乔枞贯彻一套家法理论以分析《诗经》异文,因其严守理论始得建立规模巨大的三家诗学,而不顾其牵强;王先谦纠正陈氏牵强之失,而辑佚三家的依据却变得模糊不清,此因王氏意在诗学本身,三家不过供参考而已。 Three poems in the Qing Dynasty, who have always been very public. Scholars mostly to the original appearance of the three poems in the Han Dynasty as the standard, test the gains and losses of Qing Dynasty Collection. This article distinguishes the three poems of the Han Dynasty and the Three Poems of the Qing Dynasty, and explores the different ideas of Chen Qiaoxong and Wang Xianqian purely based on the internal perspective of editing the theory of the lost poetry. It points out that Chen Qiaoxun implements a set of theories of the family law to analyze the foreign language of The Book of Songs because of its strict observance The theory began to establish a huge three poetics, regardless of its far-fetched; Wang Xianqian correct Chen’s far-fetched loss, and the basis for editing the three has become blurred, this is due to Wang intended poetics itself, three for reference Only.