论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,适用无过错责任原则的侵权案件中的证明责任如何分配众说纷纭。但是,学界一直尚未有从证明责任基本理论角度专门探讨该问题的文章。笔者试从基本理论出发探讨了适用无过错责任原则的侵权案件中的证明责任的分配原则,据此对我国相关立法规定提出了质疑和合理化建议,深入探求了因果关系推定时的证明责任归属,主张高度危险作业致人损害的侵权诉讼以及饲养动物致人损害的侵权诉讼中对因果关系不存在的证明责任应当由加害人承担。
For a long time, there are different opinions on how to distribute the burden of proof in infringement cases applying the principle of no-fault liability. However, the academic community has not yet had an article devoted to this issue from the perspective of the basic theory of burden of proof. Based on the basic principle, the author tries to discuss the principle of distribution of burden of proof in the infringement case applying the principle of no-fault liability. Based on this, the author puts forward some questions and reasonable suggestions to the relevant legislative provisions in our country, probes into the ownership of the burden of proof when inference of causality, The burden of proof on the non-existence of the causality in the tort litigation claiming the damage caused by the highly dangerous operation and the infringement litigation causing animal damage shall be borne by the perpetrator.