论文部分内容阅读
本文分析苏格拉底所言的“神灵”之声与亚伯拉罕所听到的“上帝”之声两者间的差异 ,并据此来说明两种可能的伦理学说的根本不同 ,即特定意义上的“良知”伦理学和“义务”伦理学的不同 :前者是指作者所要强调的对个体的、内在的良知的伦理诉诸 ,后者是德里达近年来一再倡导的超伦理、超规定的“义务”和“责任”要求。
This article analyzes the differences between the voices of “gods” Socrates and the “gods” heard by Abraham, and explains the fundamental difference between the two possible ethical theories, namely, the specific meaning The difference between “conscience” ethics and “obligation” ethics: The former refers to the ethical appeal to the individual and the inner conscience which the author emphasizes, and the latter is the super-ethics superintendent Advocated by Derrida in recent years, Obligation “and” responsibility "requirements.