论文部分内容阅读
本文追溯了希法亭的垄断模型的基本参数及其在20世纪前30年的主要政治应用,努力描绘了其在现代文献中复活的历史相似性。有人认为,源自列宁“帝国主义论”的希法亭模型基本上与马克思的经济学无关,却在很大程度上与垄断和寡头垄断的新古典主义理论有关。这种理论上的联系在分析框架上抛弃了劳动价值理论,认为任何资本主义积累过程都存在着崩溃(萧条)的可能性。在希法亭看来,部门间的不均衡增长是经济危机的原因,在金融资本统治的条件下,这一矛盾将得到解决,资本主义将走向有组织的阶段。以同样的方式,金融部门及其相关的公司经济部门之间的不均衡增长被当代的异端文献认为是当前危机的原因。以这种思路,通过国家调节就可以解决危机问题,因为资本的金融化被孤立地理解为利润驱动增长的内在矛盾。
This paper traces the basic parameters of Shifa Ting’s monopoly model and its main political applications in the first 30 years of the 20th century and tries hard to depict the historical similarity of his resurrection in modern literature. Some people think that the model of the shifatan originated from Lenin’s theory of “imperialism” is basically unrelated to Marx’s economics and is largely related to the neoclassical theory of monopoly and oligopoly. This theoretical connection abandoned the theory of labor value in the analytical framework and considered the possibility of any collapse (depression) in any process of capitalist accumulation. In Hilfing’s view, the imbalanced growth among sectors is the cause of the economic crisis. Under the conditions of the financial capital, this contradiction will be solved and capitalism will move toward an organized phase. In the same vein, the uneven growth in the financial sector and its related corporate sectors is considered by contemporary heresy literature as the cause of the current crisis. With this kind of thinking, the problem of crisis can be solved through state regulation because the financialization of capital is understood in isolation as the inherent contradiction of profit-driven growth.