论文部分内容阅读
本刊在1982年第5期上,曾邀请几位从事俄苏文学教学工作的老校友写了几篇谈教学经验的短文。这些短文是他们多年教学的点滴体会,有些意见是很中肯的。这组笔谈引起了大学中文系、外语系的外国文学老师、同学,以及外国文学研究工作者的兴趣。他们投书本刊,对《笔谈》中的一些意见提出了不同的看法。其中李晓明同学的来信具有一定的代表性,它反映了当前一部分同学在学习俄苏文学时的一些要求与愿望。我们觉得,从教学相长的角度来看,他的意见有些是值得认真考虑和研究的。为此,我们曾把李晓明同学的信打印出来,送给部分有关的同志参阅。几个月来,我们又陆续收到不少同志的信和文章,他们就俄苏文学的教学方针和方法、当代苏联文学的评论与介绍、俄苏文学教学与社会主义精神文明建设的关系等一系列问题,提出了自己的看法,并建议本刊能公开讨论,以期有利于俄苏文学教学新局面的开创。我们接受这一建议,从本期开始,开辟“俄苏文学教学讨论”专栏。本期先刊登李晓明同学的来信和其他几位同志的来信和文章的摘要,对上面提到的一些问题展开适当的讨论。我们希望,关心俄苏文学教学改革的老师们、同学们本着“百家争鸣”的方针和理论联系实际的原则,各抒己见,为本刊撰写短小精悍的讨论文章。通过交流切磋,以求在如何改进俄苏文学教学方针、方法和内容,如何在加强评论和研究的基础上提高教学质量,从而促进社会主义精神文明建设等方面,取得共同认识,为开创俄苏文学教学与研究的新局面做出贡献。
In the 5th issue of 1982, this magazine invited several old alumni engaged in Russian teaching of Russian literature to write several essays on teaching experience. These essays are bit by bit teaching experience for many years, some opinions are very fair. This group of written speeches aroused the interest of foreign literature teachers, students, and foreign literary researchers in the Department of Chinese, Foreign Languages Department of the University. They voted in the journal and put forward different opinions on some of the comments in the “pen-writing”. Among them, the letters from Li Xiaoming’s students have some representativeness, which reflects some of the current demands and aspirations of some students in studying Russian-Soviet literature. In our view, from the angle of teaching and learning, we think some of his views deserve careful consideration and research. For this reason, we have printed out the letter of the students from Li Xiaoming to some of the relevant comrades for reference. In recent months, we have received many letters and articles from comrades. They have been discussing the teaching methods and methods of Russian-Soviet literature, the comments and introduction of contemporary Soviet literature, the relationship between teaching Russian and Soviet literature and the construction of socialist spiritual civilization Series of questions, put forward their own views, and suggested that we can open discussion of the Journal, with a view to conducive to Russian literature teaching new situation founding. We accept this suggestion. Starting from this issue, we opened up a special column on “Russian-Soviet literature teaching and discussion.” In this issue, we first published a summary of the letters and articles from Li Xiaoming’s students and several other comrades, and discussed some of the issues mentioned above. We hope that teachers and students concerned with the teaching reform of the Russian literature and literature will give their own opinions and write short and hard discussion articles in line with the principle of “one hundred schools of thought” and the theory of combining theory with practice. Through exchanges and discussions, we should seek common understanding on how to improve the teaching methods, contents and contents of teaching Russian-Soviet literature, how to improve teaching quality on the basis of strengthening the review and research so as to promote the construction of socialist spiritual civilization, Literature teaching and research to contribute to the new situation.