论文部分内容阅读
本文首先分析了陈康对“普遍的复合物”的解释,指出把这一概念理解为与亚里士多德哲学体系不相容的做法值得商榷。进而指出,“普遍的复合物”即普遍的质形复合物就是种属,对这一概念的界定是在《形而上学》Ζ10—11中,但肯定它是定义的对象则是在一般为人所忽视的《形而上学》Η3中,在这一章节中,亚里士多德明确地指出,定义的对象不能只有形式,因为定义里需要表达一个部分对另一部分的谓述。进而亚里士多德指出,定义就是由形式对质料的描述所构成,因此,Η3在解决定义的对象和方式问题上贡献都很大。
This paper first analyzes Chen Kang’s explanation of “universal compound ” and points out that the understanding of this concept as incompatible with Aristotle’s philosophical system is debatable. Furthermore, it is pointed out that “universal compound ”, which is the universal mass complex, is the genus, and the definition of this concept is in metaphysics Z10-11, but it is certainly the object of definition, In neglected metaphysics, H.3, Aristotle explicitly pointed out in this chapter that the object of definition can not be formalistic only, because the definition requires the expression of one part to the other. Aristotle then pointed out that the definition is formed by the form of description of the material, therefore, Η3 contribution to the definition of the object and the way to make a great deal.