论文部分内容阅读
西姆拉会议之前,西藏隶属于清王朝的理藩院,“西藏独立”说纯属子虚乌有。而西姆拉会议作为殖民战争的产物,与国际法的基本理念相悖,欠缺真实性与有效性,无法实现“西藏独立”。西姆拉会议后,西藏剪不断理还乱的中华情结最终使其以民族自治区的身份重新成为社会主义新中国不可分割的一部分。因此,以国际法来审视,“西藏独立”说是不能证成的。
Before the Shimla meeting, Tibet belonged to the Qing court’s courthouse, and “Tibet independence” was purely non-existent. As a product of the colonial war, the Shimla meeting runs counter to the basic concepts of international law, lacks authenticity and effectiveness and can not achieve “Tibet independence.” After the Shimla meeting, the Chinese sentiments of the unreasonableness and rebellion of Tibet eventually made it an integral part of the new autonomous China with the status of a national autonomous region. Therefore, judging from international law, “Tibet Independence” can not be justified.