《孔子家语》是否为伪书是一个争论已久的话题,随着地下文献的出土,《孔子家语》并非伪作已成定论。但这是否就意味着《孔子家语》所记均可信·本文从《孔子家语》中的“子路负米侍亲”和“楚王得萍而食”出发,结合《论语》、《史记》等文献,考察《孔子家语》所记并非都可信。 Whether “Confucius” is a pseudo-book is a long-debated topic. With the unearthed underground literature, “Confucian language” is not a fake as a matter of fact. But does this mean that “Confucius Jiayu” can be credibly recorded? This article starts from “Neglect” and “Chu” in “Confucius” and combines “The Analects of Confucius” , “Historical Records” and other documents, study “Confucius” not all creditable.