论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对于嘉庆《四川通志》、府志、县志、《乾隆民数册》、嘉庆《大清一统志》等四种文献所载数据的分析 ,证明施坚雅在《四川通省民数册》中发现的错误在地方志中同样存在。施坚雅认为 ,嘉庆时期四川的户口数据是合理的 ,户口调查是认真的。然而 ,本文却证明嘉庆《四川通志》既存在对一大批县级户口的浮夸 ,也存在对一大批县级户口的低估 ,不加分析地使用嘉庆十七年户口数据仍是不妥当的。
Through the analysis of the data contained in the four kinds of documents including Jiaqing “Sichuan Tongzhi”, Fuzhi County, County Chronicles, “Qianlong Minzhi Book” and Jiaqing “Qing Dynasty Unified Tongzhi Zhi” The errors found in the book also exist in local chronicles. Shi Jian Ya believes that Jiaqing Sichuan household registration data is reasonable, household survey is serious. However, this article proves that Jiaqing “Sichuan Tongzhi” not only exaggerates a large number of county-level accounts but also underestimates a large number of county-level accounts. It is not proper to use Jiaqing’s seventeen-year household accounts without analysis.