2002年6月20日,最高人民法院通过了《最高人民法院关于建设工程价款优先受偿权问题的批复》(以下简称批复),对《中华人民共和国合同法》第二百八十六条如何适用给出了答案。然而,由于批复内容相对概略,对一些特定情形下的法律适用未尽明确,在司法实践中争议较大。建议最高人民法院对法释﹝2002﹞16号批复进行修订,就司法实践中出现的优先受偿权适用法律不明确的问题进一步做出解释。具体 On June 20, 2002, the Supreme People’s Court passed the Reply of the Supreme People’s Court on Priority Payment of Construction Costs (hereinafter referred to as the “Reply”), and how the “Article 86 Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China” The answer is given. However, due to the relative generality of the approval, the application of law in some specific situations is not clear and the dispute in judicial practice is quite controversial. It is suggested that the Supreme People’s Court should amend Law Society (2002) No. 16 Reply and further explain the issue of the law applicable to the priority claim in judicial practice. specific