论文部分内容阅读
北京时间3月26日晚9时,世贸组织公布了有关“美国、欧盟、日本诉中国稀土、钨、钼相关产品出口管理措施案”的专家组报告,给出了对于本案的初裁结果,认为,中国对稀土等产品实施出口关税和出口配额限制违反WTO框架规定。有关专家表示,此项裁决的合理性有待商榷,实际上相当于强迫中国放弃出口限制手段,转而选择成本较高、效率较低的其他方式保护本国的资源和环境,而在同时,又对有着全世界出口管制体系最严密的美欧自
Beijing time at 9 o’clock on the March 26, WTO announced the “United States, the European Union, Japan v. China’s rare earth, tungsten, molybdenum-related products export management measures ” panel report, given the preliminary ruling of the case As a result, it is considered that China’s implementation of export tariffs and export quotas on rare earth products is in violation of the WTO framework. Relevant experts said that the rationality of this ruling needs to be discussed. In fact, it is equivalent to forcing China to abandon its export restriction and instead choose other ways of higher cost and lower efficiency to protect its own resources and environment. At the same time, With the world’s most stringent export control system in the United States and Europe since