论文部分内容阅读
梁启超写于1920年的《老子哲学》既宣传《老子》返璞归真的人生哲学,又宣传佛家《大乘起信论》一心、二门的思想;既将老子的客观的“道”解释为毕竟平等、不可破坏之真如,又将“有生干无”的客观过程解释为万物为妄见所生,因而将返璞归真视为灭除我见、我相而证到自然之道的过程。把佛、道两种旨趣完全不同的学术纠合在一起,无疑是学问家之大忌,但如果考虑到他是在执行思想家和宗教家的社会职责,那么,他这样做也就不难理解了。
Lao Zi philosophy written by Liang Qichao in 1920 not only propagated the life philosophy of returning to the origins of Lao Tzu, but also advocated the thought of one mind and two minds of the Buddhist “Mahayana Faith Theory”; it not only explained Lao Tzu’s objective “Tao” as equality after all , It is true that it is undamaged, and the objective process of “being free from all difficulties” is interpreted as the creation of all things by reason. Therefore, we will treat the return to nature as the process of eliminating my own view and of showing one another in nature. It is undoubtedly a taboo for scholars to combine completely different academic purports of Buddhism and Taoism, but it is not hard for him to understand this if one considers that he is in the social responsibility of exercising thinkers and religious people .