论文部分内容阅读
为评估不同轮班制度下管制员的疲劳变化情况和管制员疲劳在不同轮班制度之间的差异性,根据A空管局进近管制中心、B空管局进近管制中心和B空管局区域管制中心3个管制单位的不同轮班制度,设计疲劳测量方案,采集管制员脑电信号并以脑电慢波能量与快波能量之比作为表征疲劳状态的疲劳指标,采用SPSS15.0软件分析3种轮班制度下疲劳指标变化情况以及不同轮班制度对疲劳影响的差异性。结果表明:在同一轮班制度下,各次测量的管制员疲劳指标存在差异性;不同轮班制度对疲劳的影响存在显著性差异,A空管局进近管制中心的疲劳值最小,B空管局进近管制中心次之,B空管局区域管制中心最大。
To assess the differences in controller fatigue and controller fatigue among different shift schedules for different shift schedules, based on the differences between ATCA approach control center, ATCA approach control center and B ATC area The control system of the three control units of different shift system, the design of fatigue measurement program to collect controller EEG signal and the ratio of EEG slow wave energy and fast wave energy as a fatigue indicator of fatigue state, using SPSS15.0 software analysis 3 Variation of Fatigue Indexes under Different Shift Systems and Different Effects of Different Shift Systems on Fatigue. The results show that there are differences in the fatigue indicators of controllers under different working shifts under the same work shift schedule. There is a significant difference in the fatigue effects between different shift schedules, and the fatigue value of A Approach Control Center is the smallest. Next to the approach control center, B had the largest regional control center.