论文部分内容阅读
目的对胃镜检查时麻醉与非麻醉的临床检查效果进行对比与探讨。方法选取我院2013年3月到2014年3月所收治的胃镜检查患者98例作为研究对象,按随机表法将其平均分成两组,即观察组与对照组,对照组患者采取在非麻醉的状况下实施胃镜检查,而观察组患者则在麻醉的状况下实施胃镜检查,并对两组患者的检查效果进行观察。结果观察组患者的检查成功率为100%,而对照组检查成功率为91.8%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组检查后的各项指标明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于胃镜检查患者而言,采取非麻醉和麻醉方式都可以获得比较好的检查效果,但是对患者采取麻醉之后再行胃镜检查,其可行性与安全性比较高,且能有效减轻患者的疼痛。
Objective To compare and discuss the clinical results of anesthesia and non-anesthesia in gastroscopy. Methods A total of 98 patients with gastroscopy who were admitted to our hospital from March 2013 to March 2014 were selected as the research objects. According to the random table method, they were divided into two groups equally: the observation group and the control group. The patients in the control group were treated with non-anesthetic Of patients underwent gastroscopy, while patients in the observation group underwent gastroscopy under anesthesia and observed the effect of the two groups of patients. Results The success rate of the observation group was 100%, while the control group was 91.8%, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05); the indexes of the observation group were significantly lower than the control group, the difference There was statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion For patients undergoing gastroscopy, both non-anesthetic and anesthesia methods can achieve better results. However, the gastroscopy performed after anesthesia is more feasible and safe, and can effectively reduce the patient’s pain .