论文部分内容阅读
目的 比较近红外线,超声波及手诊检查在乳腺肿物测量中的差异。方法 回顾分析了乳房的良、恶性肿瘤共91例,其中良性肿瘤51例,恶性肿瘤40例。分别用以上三种方法测定肿瘤水平面的最大直径,将其与病理学测量值作比较。结果 良性肿瘤,各种测量方法与病理学测量的差异不大。恶性肿瘤,病理学测量的直径为2.9cm(0.5～8.5),手诊查体所测结果最大,直径为3.6cm(1.0～10.5);其次为近红外线,直径为3.3cm(0.5～9.5);超声波检查结果最小,直径为2.7cm(0.5～8.5)。与病理检查相关最近的是超声波检查,相关系数为0.92,标准误为0.20。结论 三种检查方法与病理学检查均有一定差距,其中以超声波检查与病理学检查的结果差距最小。
Objectives To compare the differences between near-infrared, ultrasound and hand examinations in the measurement of breast masses. Methods A total of 91 cases of benign and malignant breast tumors were retrospectively analyzed. There were 51 benign tumors and 40 malignant tumors. The maximum diameter of the tumor level was determined using the above three methods, respectively, and compared with the pathological measurements. Results Benign tumors showed little difference between various measurement methods and pathological measurements. Malignant tumors, the pathological diameter of 2.9cm (0.5 ~ 8.5), hand examination examination results are the largest, the diameter of 3.6cm (1.0 ~ 10.5); followed by near-infrared, the diameter of 3.3cm (0.5 ~ 9.5) Ultrasound examination results are the smallest, with a diameter of 2.7 cm (0.5 to 8.5). The most recent related pathological examination was ultrasound examination with a correlation coefficient of 0.92 and a standard error of 0.20. Conclusion There is a certain gap between the three examination methods and pathological examination, and the difference between the ultrasound examination and the pathological examination is the smallest.